[Paper-reviews] Re: Review request - P4003R3, "A Minimal Coroutine Execution Model"

On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 7:27 AM Mateusz Pusz via Paper-reviews < paper-reviews@lists.wg21.org> wrote:

- A second `task` is likely a no-go, as C++26 already took `std::execution::task`.

Yes this is a potential problem and I write about it in this paper: *Why I Write* https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P4263R0.pdf Do note that P4003 does not propose a task type. It only propose IoAwaitable, and a couple of other concepts and concrete types. It is the minimum amount needed for a coroutine-native I/O foundation. Thanks