29 Jun
2026
29 Jun
'26
2:49 p.m.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 7:10 AM Matt Borland via Paper-reviews < paper-reviews@lists.wg21.org> wrote:
It looks like after many years of research and development they've arrived back at a similar problem in a narrower form. I think it's less they rediscovered the problem and more their hypothesis failed, which in research is completely ok.
Right, and P4286, which is an information-only paper, shows this does it not?
As above, I think the argument is weakest in that it seems to posit that once an issue has been identified there's no space for additional research.
What argument do you think the paper makes? And what issue do you think it identifies? Thanks