On Sat, Jun 27, 2026 at 4:20 AM Andrzej Krzemieński via Paper-reviews < paper-reviews@lists.wg21.org> wrote:
Then I have mischaracterized. I aplogize.
Appreciated. To your point though, I have now heard from multiple people that my abstracts are not informative. This is not the LLMs fault, but mine. The abstracts reflect what I think should be in an abstract. If multiple people are telling me this is not useful, then I can't ignore it. The solution is to redefine the algorithm for how abstracts are generated. What should be in an abstract? You suggest it should have: 1. a compact summary of what the paper says 2. the reason that the paper exists Is this correct? On a related note... if all my abstracts are wrong, this means that I will have to update every published paper for August. The committee reception will be... interesting. Thanks